Right i get the halos are a more effective and efficient weapon. (Dont mean to be so aggressive on the forums; by product of dealing with the flood questioning [b][i][u]every single post ive made on validity[/u][/i][/b])
But that wasnt my point or argument. All i was saying IS the death star IS more powerful and with the math's ive posted i HAVE proven it. I KNOW the halos are more efficient and effective at their designed purpose.
The death star's shielding and contained computer regulated environment WOULD ALSO keep it operational [b][i][u]indefinitely[/u][/i][/b] so long as nothing aboard broke.
The Halo systems do have a crew; AI and nano tech for self repair. Does the SAME purpose as a manned crew.
I do get the halos are more efficient but im not questioning, arguing, debating, or bashing that idea.
Just saying the death star is more powerful and thats it.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.