{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/4/2015 5:56:45 PM
5
Bringing all of the Halo arrays into the Star Wars universe and spreading them out, and setting them all off at once, would obliterate all of the opposing force. Forerunners are op as fûck.
English
-
An yet it only equates to the destruction/displacement of the mass of A SMALL rocky planet: and they need a WHOLE NETWORK of halos to do it! The death star is more powerful by destructive power yield per firing!
-
Edited by Alpha: 9/5/2015 9:40:13 AMOne halo's pulse erase every life form in 25000 light years. All halo for completely erase every life form in galaxy.
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 9/5/2015 9:53:21 AMYea; 25,000 light years x 18 (number of halos last i knew) = 450,000 light years (cubed) the milky way galaxy is 126,000 light years in diameter (so A=4Pi x r^2= 4.99 x 10^10) Milky way is= 49,900,000,000 light years (roughly and only 2/3-5/8 is inhabited by the disc of the galaxy) Halo range is 9.1125x 10^16 So yea it can take out all life in the galaxy. But you should know: 450,000 or 4,500,000 times 1,000,000,000,000 (one trillion) average human life forms DOES NOT EQUAL the mass/weight OF MARS (1/3 the size of earth; 1/3 to 1/5 the mass) (4.5x10^18 average humans is barely equal to 6.39x10^20 metric tons, mass/weight of mars. Not sure if 4.5x10^18 is 450,000x 1 trillion or 4,500,000 x 1 trillion is all. I AM SURE on the rest tho)
-
Well, but what's up with planets mass if everyone died? Halo is not for massive destruction.
-
Again i get it. I posted cuz every one says the halo network is more POWERFUL. Its NOT, its more effective for life annihilation yes but its FAR LESS POWERFUL
