{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Ungod:
9/3/2015 11:11:10 PM
2
Her freedom of religion is not being infringed. Another person's rights ends where another's begin. Religious freedom does not give you the right to discriminate on others because that effects others rights. For instance, I cannot sacrifice a human and get away scott free because my religion demands human sacrifice. Get it?
Also do you realize the havok that would be caused if minor clerks could pick and choose which papers they process? Oh you want to file a lawsuit against that person who ran over your child? Oh well, that person happens to be my friend so I'm not going to file this.
English
-
Okay so let's look at it objectively. You claim her rights aren't being infringed. Let's consider: She is being forced to make one of the following two negative choices, 1.) To issue marriage licenses to homosexuals, which would infringe on her religious conscience, which is violating her right to Religion. 2.) Quit. This will leave her unemployed and lower her standard of living. And why? Because people are forcing her to believe something she doesn't and directly goes against her religion. So she lost her job because of her religion, which is in violation of her right to practice her religion. Human sacrifices are unethical in all modern religions, every single one of them. This argument is a hyperbole at best. Do you realize the quandary of this case? You may feel strongly one way because of your own bias, but from a neutral standpoint, both have solid arguments. It just fairs worse for the woman because she is a hypocrite and frankly ignorant.
-
You seem confused. No one is forcing her to believe anything. What she is trying to do is take away others rights. That is not protected freedom of religion. Period end, there is no quandary about it. It's plain and simple. She can't infringe on others rights. A religion is deemed by the supreme Court any sincerely held belief. It's why atheists can get religious protections as well even though they aren't technically a religion at all.
