You're one to talk.
You base your view of existence on the writings of an old book.
When asked to defend your points, you give quotes from the book.
When asked to prove that the book is a valid source, you respond that the book tells you not to defend your position to those that do not follow the book.
When asked why you won't defend your position, you simply say that the other person is wrong and you are right, and that they are blind to reason for disagreeing with you despite the fact that you have given no logical arguments to support your position.
I'm not quite sure you even know what logic is.
English
-
[quote]You're one to talk. You base your view of existence on the writings of an old book. When asked to defend your points, you give quotes from the book. When asked to prove that the book is a valid source, you respond that the book tells you not to defend your position to those that do not follow the book. When asked why you won't defend your position, you simply say that the other person is wrong and you are right, and that they are blind to reason for disagreeing with you despite the fact that you have given no logical arguments to support your position. I'm not quite sure you even know what logic is.[/quote]
-
[quote]You're one to talk. You base your view of existence on the writings of an old book. When asked to defend your points, you give quotes from the book. When asked to prove that the book is a valid source, you respond that the book tells you not to defend your position to those that do not follow the book. When asked why you won't defend your position, you simply say that the other person is wrong and you are right, and that they are blind to reason for disagreeing with you despite the fact that you have given no logical arguments to support your position. I'm not quite sure you even know what logic is.[/quote]
-
Go pray to the Flying Spaghetti Monster fagnut
-
R'amen
-
lol ya
-
Ad hominem
-
Firstly, this post isn't about anything you brought up. And I only quote the bible when I've answered all your questions and you reject the answers because they disagree with your presuppositions. You make nonsense arguments and refuse to accept any correction. You've demonstrated time and again that you aren't looking for answers or truth, you seek only to justify your presuppositions.
-
You are under the impression that your arguments are flawless. I have no presupposition to prove, and I am not opposed to correction. However, after having heard and considered your "logic", I have decided that your arguments have no merit. This reply of yours demonstrates exactly what I talked about in my post. You have already come to your conclusion, and if anyone doesn't agree you instantly assume that they are incapable of intelligent thought. You yourself are the one who is opposed to correction. You have already accepted the bible as presenting fact, so you fail to see the error you make in quoting bible verses and expecting people to be convinced by them. If I were set in my presuppositions, I would still be a Christian like yourself. It is because I am open to correction that I am a skeptic. I weighed all arguments and found that science presents the best answers. Correction is only possible if one questions oneself, something you are clearly unable or unwilling to do.
-
And there you go again, dodging anyone's point who is right or is being reasonable
-
[quote]And there you go again, dodging anyone's point who is right or is being reasonable[/quote]
-
Actually I addressed his points. And explained why I did the things I did.
-
I've seen this guy before he's just an ass, ignore him