You know I hate when strangers expect a carry as much as the next guy...but you should have just booted him earlier. Honestly you only made it harder on yourselves when you could have had a 3rd person helping. So basically because you wanted to screw this guy over you handicapped yourself. Seems like a bit much to me.
English
-
actually, gulrot's challenge thing isnt that hard. me amd my cousin made it to the 4th round before having to call in a 3rd person. we kept wiping on the mines :,(
-
Way to totally miss the point.....
-
Edited by GANTZ: 8/21/2015 10:56:53 AMbut they enjoy abusing the kick feature , thats why they rather played handicapped with him than replace him with a contributing member immediately, then they could jerk off for kicking someone right before the reward , i hope someone does the same to OP
-
I guess it's just a lot of very young people but it seems there's a lot of this type of stuff. Talk crap about someone for doing something while your reaction to what they did makes you no better. Sounds corny but still holds true....two wrongs don't make a right.
-
imo , abusing kick in such way is worse than being afk or not contributing "enough" (enough is subjective so people should at no point be allowed to decide this by giving them a kick feature to begin with)
-
So you are saying it's ok to literally not contribute at all to a POE, Raid, Trials, and I shouldn't be kicked for it? I've been playing the game all wrong! I will start AFK from now on
-
kick abuse is much worse
-
No it's not. If I'm playing POE, and you aren't doing a thing, you can bet I'm kicking you to find someone else. I don't help freeloaders. Maybe OP should have kicked them sooner, but honestly I hope it taught that kid a lesson. Don't pull your weight, don't get rewards.
-
Edited by GANTZ: 8/21/2015 11:48:24 AM[quote][spoiler]you can bet I'm kicking you to find someone else[/spoiler][/quote] thats the thin line between kick and kick abuse, they didnt do it to invite someone else , but for the sake of kick abuse and revenge
-
No, they did it to teach that kid a lesson. That's not kick abuse.
-
No, they did it to act tough, which is why he ran straight to the forums to boast about it, if he wanted to teach a lesson he would have kicked at round 2 and got another player in.
-
No that wouldn't have taught that kid a lesson.
-
And you know that for certain how?
-
kick abuse is much worse
-
this ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^