{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Celoxamortis:
8/21/2015 2:18:12 AM
6
[quote]For most of us, these exotics (like gally) were not easy to get.[/quote]
Oh, boo hoo.
Let me tell you the story of [url=http://www.wowhead.com/item=19019/thunderfury-blessed-blade-of-the-windseeker]Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker[/url], which took 8 months of running Molten Core and Blackwing Lair 40-man raids for my Tauren Warrior to obtain in vanilla Warcraft. I finally got it in June of 2006. You know what happened in January 2007? The Burning Crusade. That Thunderfury was replaced by a level 65 dungeon drop. For the last 8 and a half years, Thunderfury has been in my bank collecting dust because it was left behind and replaced by new gear and new legendaries to chase.
This is the very cornerstone of the genre. You must be one of those people who bought into the whole [i]"But Destiny's NOT an MMO!"[/i] line of BS. Sorry you were led astray because the very core of Destiny IS MMORPG. At the risk of being THAT guy, just be thankful they're allowing some of the exotics to move forward. It's better than the Warcraft model where nothing but cosmetic stuff was worth keeping into a new expansion.
English
-
Yet they introduced the idea etheric light system to ascend their old weapons. Also 6 months ago they said exotics would folow you through your journey. Destiny also hasnt taken any of the major benefits a mmo gives
-
Edited by Swiftlock: 8/21/2015 2:22:56 AMWoW has overwhelming amounts of content, a subscription fee, and the ability to consistently make players WANT to put down their old gear to take up the new stuff with each passing expansion. Destiny does not. Argument invalid.
-
Destiny's content "fee" doesn't lock-out players if they don't pay, if limiting their progress for 7 USD per-month. Compared to WoW's 15 for 3 characters with Expansions on-top of that and a smaller dev team it's understandable why. Besides, console. Argument back on the table.
-
Comparing a content-less game to a game full of content. Your argument broke the table and died a horrible death 10 years ago.
-
When you compare the base game of both titles upon release than yes. And it's cheaper per-month which alleviates the content reduction as you're paying less for less.
-
Just because it's an MMO doesn't mean it needs all the worst aspects of an MMO
