{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Nihlus:
8/20/2015 9:37:04 PM
15
As a series? No. I believe there's been more good games than bad in the series.
Good:
CoD 1
CoD 2 and The Big Red One
CoD 4 MW
CoD WaW
CoD MW2
Meh:
CoD BO1
CoD BO2
Bad:
CoD 3
CoD MW3
CoD Ghosts
CoD Advance Warfare
[spoiler]Battlefield is by no means realistic. But still...
BF >>> CoD[/spoiler]
English
-
BO2 was the worst
-
-
Shit hit-detection, walls made out of paper, 0 gun balance, broken snipers. These are the most basic stuff in an FPS and it was never fixed
-
How is AW bad? The crybabies asked for change and got it....
-
If you call those gimmicky exos, "change" and those tacked on supply drops.
-
Change as in for the whole COD series in general. It was the 1st cod to have a new movement system. Sledgehammer even added the most guns for a COD including weapons fans wanted from older CODs
-
MW3 was way better than WaW
-
Are you on crack?
-
-
You can't truly be serious.
-
I.Am.Dead.Serious. AAAAAAAND Never forget opinions...that would make my post invalid
-
Fair enough. Its still the unbalanced CoD to date.
-
Nah Look at AW I like all CoDs but still >~>
-
I agree and I think that the originals are way better than the newer versions. Also battlefield isn't the most realistic but I think that it's more realistic than any cod game
-
[quote]I agree and I think that the originals are way better than the newer versions. Also battlefield isn't the most realistic but I think that it's more realistic than any cod game[/quote]
