{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/20/2015 10:45:42 AM
2
No you're not the only one, but a lot of people these days suffer from entitlement mentalities. I was very critical of TTK and by my standards the dlc either met or exceeded what I desired. I do understand nearly everything yesterday was just the 2.0 update, and not actually TTK, but when you really take in what TTK has in it, it really does come close to being a full game in and of itself despite not having multiple new areas. I want to qualify that last statement by saying new game compared to what Destiny originally was not by comparing it to witcher 3 GTA V, ESO, and any other game that has more content.
English
-
Edited by Killer4life7670: 8/20/2015 10:59:50 AMWell that was the entire problem from launch, lack of content. I understand that game dev costs have skyrocketed exponentially the last 1 or 2 decades and that maybe we as a community should be more open to varying costs of games (in the upward direction) up front, rather than only lower (indie games). however, the fact that they weren't honest about it is what makes me angry. Launch Destiny was practically a pretty beta build, launched for the same cost as something filled to the brim with content, like The Witcher 3.
-
Its like players expect Bungie to tailor-craft Destiny to be just for [i]them[/i].
![[REDACTED]](/img/profile/avatars/Marathon-terminal-scan-02.gif?cv=3983621215&av=1897492508)
