{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Bluefoxx3:
8/20/2015 7:12:10 AM
2
Treyarch did the impossible when they made World At War.
Call of Duty nowadays has become nothing more than a twitch-styled shooter.
They're better games coming out worth the $60.
I'm more interested in the single player as that's where CoD's strength has always been with a weak multiplayer since MW3. Battlefield's strength though is in its multiplayer with a weak single player.
English
-
Treyarch always have an awesome zombie mode. You get a lot of content, longevity from a cod game.
-
Edited by Junzi: 8/20/2015 11:43:36 AMWeak multiplayer my ass bo2 and bo3 multiplayer is actually good. It's just you can't adapt and therefore call it shit.people like you would just complain after a few years if they switch back to WW2 and say we want something different that's the same mindset we got futuristic cods now
