{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/11/2015 6:10:14 AM
1
I have to disagree. He might not always be on point, but he does make good points usually. He may be a bit abrasive at times, but that doesn't change the fact that he does make a valid argument. But again, to each his own battle.
English
-
Only thing valid he says is the "beta testing" of year one Which is bungie trying to figure out what to do specifically and what kind of ppl play there game idk if he expected some insane game that's godly in every way give it some time And if you wanna save money then wait a year for the next bundle and no one will do raids with you cause they'll be doing new stuff But WHATEVER good statements doe
-
Technically he says more than just the notion about the beta testing. He does make arguments over actual actions. I wouldn't say he was expecting a godly game. Many aren't satisfied with the overall product that is Destiny. Myself included, I only expected a finished game. Destiny doesn't feel like one. That doesn't mean it's the worst game ever, or that it's not fun. It just doesn't feel finished. Hopefully TTK will make it. But as he says, is that right? Should I(we) really have to buy an expansion for a game we already paid for to make it feel complete. It's a valid argument. Some like Destiny as is, but many do not. Only the future knows what it will foretell.
