{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/4/2015 10:33:50 PM
1
I have. The game informer guy who played it says he didn't miss the weapons being left behind. So, just because Fatebringer is the best of the year 1 weapons - doesn't mean that it shouldn't be left behind.
English
-
One person doesn't mean it's fact.
-
One person doesn't make it a fact - but someone who hasn't played it doesn't really have a leg to stand on.
-
Exactly, have you played it then?
-
No, but I understand that if Bungie can't make a gun better than Fatebringer then the franchise is dead.
-
Except they sold us on every gun has a story blah blah blah. So that must've been BS then. Great, they come across as liars or incompetent.
-
That is a fallacy (false equivalence to be exact).
-
Nope. Try again.
-
Each gun has a story doesn't mean that the story is about a gun. That is a classic logical fallacy.
-
Lol, no it's not. Just saying something doesn't make it true.
-
True. Which is why I have explained my statements, unlike you. The same is equally true of what you say. You are either engaged in fallacious thought or failing to express yourself correctly.
-
No you haven't, you explained nothing. Bungie are either liars or incompetent. Now that is a fact. Not much you've said is anything but speculation or opinion.
-
You still don't get it. Bungie saying that every gun has a story doesn't logically flow through that every gun must be ascendable forever. That is a false equivalence. A clan mate just got his Blackhammer after 36 attempts. That is a story. Bungie didn't lie about that. Nor does that mean that Bungie is incompetent that the Blackhammer won't be ascendable because it negates the story. No, it didn't. You're argument is fallacious.
-
Edited by Queeg 500: 8/5/2015 8:33:17 PMBut that is what the lie was. Jesus. Christ. Just stop, you've embarrassed yourself enough.
