{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/28/2015 9:22:43 PM
1
Doesn't it depend on what your definition of a conversation is? If someone believes a conversation is when two people discuss for a finite amount of time, would it really be starting a new conversation or creating a new path for the current conversation to take?
English
-
Don't you think you already know my opinion on this?
-
Didn't you want to hear mine?
-
Haven't you already defended it, even though it may have not been outright stated?
-
Do you think it was more well defined in my last responses than it was throughout the rest of the conversation?
-
But doesn't a conversation have to flow? Would you consider an irrelevant interjection part of the conversation, or the beginning of a new one?
-
Do you think it is as I said earlier, and that it can be both depending on what you see a conversation as?
-
Shouldn't there be a set definition for what is a conversation?
-
Is it not up for debate, like so many things in this world?
-
Should it be?
-
Are we not having a debate right now, proving that its definition is shaky enough to warrant a debate?
-
Or are we just uneducated on the definition?
-
Do you think our intelligence could hardly be characterized as "uneducated"?
