I'd like an exotic crossbow for my hunter, same stats as a sniper rifle.
It would look good on your back running around if nothing else.
English
-
Yeah. That could be really good. I imagine that there would be some balancing issues, though. For one, it shouldn't be a hitscan weapon. It's bolts should have travel time and be fairly hard hitting. The way, I see it, the Crossbow will either be underpowered or overpowered. It will be really hard to balance against the sniper rifles. Maybe giving it much more accurate hip fire than a sniper rifle would help?
-
I was hoping the Queensbreaker Bow would be a crossbow.
-
I love how people immediately assume a random idea like a crossbow would have balancing issues. Idiots.
-
Edited by The Fallen Zyzz: 7/26/2015 7:52:56 AMHow many games have you played with a bow weapon in it? In Crysis 3, the Bow was incredibly powerful as it is a OHK and doesn't disrupt cloaking. On the other hand, in Planetside 2, the Crossbow is a bit gimmicky and isn't as powerful as the base sidearms and the crossbow in Treyarch's Call of Duty titles has always been a gimmick weapon. Really, how many competitive multiplayer FPS games have you played with a bow weapon that wasn't overpowered, underpowered or just a straight up gimmick? I've seen where crossbows usually end up in multiplayer FPS. I speak from experience. Don't talk out of your arse. You just make yourself sound like a proper moron.
-
You are the one talking out of your ass, making things up that don't even exist. I don't know if you noticed, but just because crysis has a bow in it doesn't mean it will be the same as in Destiny. They are two different games, crazy thought I know. Idiot.
-
Edited by The Fallen Zyzz: 7/26/2015 9:36:15 AMReally? I'm talking out of my ass? That's an awfully bold claim as I have provided specific examples of a bow styled weapon being either over or underpowered. There is this little thing called 'precedent'. Don't know if you've ever heard of it. Us higher functioning human beings tend to look at prior cases or events and establish a hypothesis or conclusion based upon it. As we have observed, crossbows and bows tend to be pretty difficult to balance against firearms. If you had more than two brain cells to rub together, you might have figured that out and not made an idiot out of yourself publicly. [spoiler]Honestly, it's like you troglodytes don't even try anymore.[/spoiler]
-
You provided specific irrelevant examples of bow weapons that have nothing to do with this game...you officially won the stupidity award of the past two days, congratulations.
-
Alright, let's boil this down to the basic principals. Clearly, you cannot understand. Don't worry, I am used to working with children so I will make this easy for you. Bows: • Slow travel time • Slow refire time • High damage Guns: • Very fast rate of fire • medium to high damage • fast projectile travel time Do you seriously not see how these two cannot be easily and smoothly balanced against each other? Does that elude you? Honestly, out of all the idiots that I have intellectually curb-stomped, you are by far the most deluded. You have failed the basic principles of debate and argument. You do not provide a case nor backing evidence to prove your side. I really hope that you do not consider yourself to be an intellectual. If I am so wrong, then why don't you prove it? Instead of just saying "you're wrong" why don't you prove it by providing evidence or by deconstructing my argument? Is it because you can't? Well, well, colour me shocked! I never would have guessed that someone of your formidable intellectual calibre would be incapable of deconstructing a post on the internet.
-
Bardock? Dbz much? :)