The fact that you're using an article (which is an opinion there BIG guy ;)) to state something is a fact, let's me know what I've been saying is right all along. That study has an incredibly small sample size, which I'm sure you are quite aware of right? Or did you just read the big bold letters like the true smarty pants that you are, time efficiency am I right? I'm sure, since you're such a worldly individual, you've seen similar studies conducted by news reporters about other stations, political biases, and so on...
Well clearly you either have not, or are just too thick to remember that everything goes both ways, everyone has an agenda, not just FOX, and those researchers conducting this study have the same agenda the researchers do that have conducted similar "studies" on people, targeting the aforementioned things above.
You're hopeless and pretentious(look that one up), stuck in your ways and unable to see the other side of most things if I had to guess. Which is cool, because you'll likely shut half the people out of your life and die blissfully ignorant or alone and sad. And either way it's no skin off my ass and one less idiot in the world eventually.
English
-
Edited by mshelton023: 7/21/2015 3:23:57 PMIt's mathematical fact that a poll sample size of 1000 will give a 95% chance to yield a finding within +/- 3% and you can Google that too. Any more brain busters? See again, I can easily refute your pitiful responses because I have FACTS on my side. Whereas you have nothing but a false perception of yourself as being intelligent...