Well would you? In my own opinion Halo Reach was and is the best Halo game ever made. 343 will never be able to to top what Bungie accomplished with Reach. All opinions welcome.
-
Hell yeah
-
Ugh no.
-
No. Not because it's bad but the original looks fine as it is. With backwards compatibility it wouldn't be necessary.
-
-
Lolno
-
Hell yes. But it shouldn't be remade for a few years if it's going to be remade. And if it is, instead of HD just have blur redo all the cutscenes like in H2A.
-
They did good with CEA and Halo 2 Anniversary, so I'm confident they would do good with Reach or even Halo 3, plus its a Halo game, I would get it anyway
-
I already have it in HD, so no.
-
Yes, best one.
-
Hell yeah!
-
Nope.
-
All of my monies yes
-
Would rather have halo 3 remastered
-
-
Yes, it's my favorite halo
-
Absolutely not.
-
I got the non remastered reach 7 times so yes
-
I'm sure it will be included in MCC as DLC [spoiler]for the small price of a full scale game![/spoiler] [spoiler]doesnt that sound familiar?[/spoiler]
-
-
-
So much yes
-
[url=http://example.com][b][i][u]YES![/u][/i][/b][/url]
-
Only if I get to port all my saved information from my 360 given the countless hours making custom game types and maps. Everyone having all the DLC would be nice to have more variety in the matchmaking. (Bungie should have forced the DLC like they did in Halo 3.) Make the playlists fun again. 343i f**ked Reach by throwing in garbage playlist, showing how terribad they were even before "Halo" 4.
-
Edited by MaxSterling: 7/20/2015 3:00:31 PMI enjoyed Firefight, but nothing about the game was truly over enjoyable. Give me ODST Firefight. Reach's was inferior compared to ODST Firefight.
-
Why would we need a remaster? Game isn't that old and we're getting it through backwards compatibility anyways.
-
No, because 343 f*cked up the game play.