JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

7/19/2015 6:28:15 PM
10
The argument that Black Hammer is better than exotic snipers so it should be nerfed isn't a sensible one. Fatebringer is better than most exotic primaries in PvE, should we exclusively nerf that as well? In PvE, the only ones that would be (situationally) better are Bad Juju (fast supers in certain sections such as Crota maze, Oracles), Universal Remote (if you wanna bumrush in dragon strikes) and Vex Mythoclast (solar burn). Even then, Fatebringer is still a much better all-round primary than the above 3 due to its lightning fast reload and splash damage. It takes a dump on every other legendary primary in the game. So nerf the Fatebringer then. Where's the consistency? Fatebringer is the best primary PvE in the game making all other legendary primaries obsolete. Nerf it Bungie. With the Fatebringer one can breeze by the add spawn content just as easily as the BH does against the stationary bosses (that makes it 95% of the game mind you). In fact, the best possible PvE loadout (not counting burns) is Fatebringer / Black Hammer (shottie for short maps) / Gally. So you nerfed 2 of them. Nerf the Fatebringer too. For the record, I have multiple Fatebringers. I just want to see Bungie be consistent in their reasoning and nerf the single most powerful PvE primary in the game since they nerfed the best RL and best sniper.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon