{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/19/2015 11:43:09 AM
2
What about the player with tons of time in who played each day that never got it for the majority of a year? I learned to play without it thus why you are destroyed by one weapon being nerfed and I'm not.
English
-
I'm referring to the reason they gave for the nerf. They nerf a weapon cuz they think I'm now going to take in noobs for shelter. Unnecessary. If they were so concerned about the weapon dividing the community they should have stopped counting their money and sold the weapon. I never cared who had it. I never cared if Xur sold it. They should have never nerfed it. One of the most popular game weapons ever made nerfed over recruitment. Pathetic
-
The recruitment was a problem that NEEDED to be addressed. With all my hours someone who had less than a quarter of my experience would get into a raid because they had ghorn and I would not due to the lack of it. Most PvE groups require it cutting me from much of that unless I get lucky. Skolas is a fight I am excluded from, for example. If you don't see the problem then you have likely had ghorn a while and have succumbed to the exclusivity.
-
I never play and I still got it three times
-
Just proves my point. Casual- 3 times. Constant play- 0.
