{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by T3A Complete:
7/17/2015 3:55:39 PM
6
Agreed. They thought "Must have Gjallarhorn" was a problem before I think they just made it worse.
English
-
Like opening the pandoras box
-
I guess it depends how much they nerf it but I can def see it happening.
-
It'll upset most of the player base, even if they nerf it with 1%. It's not the nerf that annoys people, it's the flawed logic they use. They hide behind the LFG excuse, while it's clear they wanna take the crutch gun for killing endgame content away.
-
[quote]Agreed. They thought "Must have Gjallarhorn" was a problem before I think they just made it worse.[/quote]this^^^
-
Exactly
-
Yup, I'm fearing that as well!
