Paleontologists recently unearthed this amazingly well fossilized dinosaur that has been named [i]Zhenyuanlong suni[/i]. You may notice something very interesting about this dinosaur.
1) its a raptor, complete with the sharp deadly toe claws
2) its got feathers.
At about 2 meters in legnth (just over 6feet) its the biggest winged dinosaur discovered to date.
[quote]An ancient feathered creature dug up in northeastern China is the largest winged dinosaur ever found, researchers say.
The fossil of the prehistoric raptor is so well preserved that scientists have been able to reconstruct its impressive plumage, from the tiny feathers on its head and neck, to the larger quill pen-like feathers that sprout from its tail and substantial wings.
A cousin of the velociraptor made famous by the Jurassic Park movies, the carnivore two metres in length lived 125m years ago in the region where dense forests became home to some of the first flowering plants.
.....
The near complete skeleton of the feathered raptor was found in sedimentary rock that formed in ancient lake beds in China’s Liaoning Province. The Yixian formation there has become a treasure trove of exquisitely-preserved dinosaurs, many of which [url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/sep/24/dinosaur-fossil-discovery-china]sported feathers[/url] which confirms that birds evolved from dinosaurs.
It’s the biggest dinosaur that has ever been found with wings,” said Steve Brusatte, a paleontologist at Edinburgh University. “In general it is very bird-like, but it’s big, and has these very short arms with full-blown wings.” Details of the discovery are published in the journal, Scientific Reports.
The specimen poses a conundrum for researchers, because despite its impressive wings, the animal was probably incapable of flight. Brusatte said their function was a mystery, but they might have been used in colourful sexual displays, just as peacocks parade their tail feathers to court peafowls. Another possibility is that the dinosaur used its wings to protect its eggs. [/quote]
The discovery of this winged, yet flightless dinosaur is raising questions about why wings evolved in the first place if not for the purpose of flight.
[quote]
The discovery raises broader questions about how wings evolved in the first place. Small, fluffy feathers are thought to have arisen for warmth, with more elaborate feather structures emerging for displays, and ultimately flight.
But Brusatte said that wings themselves might have evolved for reasons other than flight, before they helped creatures take to the skies.
“When you see a dinosaur like this that’s pretty big, and has these short arms and bird-like wings, it begs that question: what are wings really for? We used to think pretty much anything that had wings was flying, but that’s not so clear now,” he said[/quote]
Interesting. Discuss.
[spoiler]source: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/16/zhenyuanlong-suni-biggest-ever-winged-dinosaur-discovered-china [/spoiler]
-
Wow that's cool!
-
Lol in the first Jurassic park, the main character believed that raptors were ancestors of birds. So he wanted to see at the park wether they had feathers or not. After that movie released this fossil was found proving the characters hypothesis.
-
To be fair, they were genetically engineered dinos. Not mom's ol fashioned. So they probably just looked like how the scientists wanted them to look like
-
Not to try to invalidate your point, but they covered their asses in the movies by saying that they didn't have a full set of Dino DNA, so they used some genomes from other animals that are still alive today, which made the Dinos look slight different than actual dinosaurs.
-
Why don't we just let Hollywood be Hollywood and not complain about scientific correctness?
-
Edited by TheCroatoan: 7/17/2015 4:12:18 AM"Evolution isn't real" they said...
-
I agreed to that. I believe when they made the first movie though, they hadn't discovered the connections and such. To change the models mid-franchise would have hurt the business and confused many people.
-
Edited by Gomly1980: 7/17/2015 3:56:57 AMRaptors being feathered has been known for a while. http://dinosaurs.about.com/od/typesofdinosaurs/a/raptors.htm http://www.smithsonianmag.com/videos/category/3play_1/what-jurassic-park-got-wrong-about-raptors/?no-ist http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/20/a-velociraptor-without-feathers-isnt-a-velociraptor/ That you found is cousin to the raptor, it's a new species. It's much larger than "normal" raptors, interesting read.
-
[i] [/i]
-
Indeed
-
The one scientist explains that the dinosaurs in the park are technically all hybrids (since gaps in the DNA were filed with parts from other species) and that real dinosaurs probably would have looked very differently. It's would explain the lack of feathers and their enormous size (an actual Velociraptor would be closer to the size of a turkey).
-
Well, in the most recent movie they were genetically modified so that explains Jurassic World at least.
-
Edited by Łę Thüñdęřśtœrm: 7/17/2015 3:31:04 AMHai gyz, letz make thiz randum pust cuz it totawee matterz now that the moviez bean out for like 3 munths now! Edit: I am referring to Jurassic World. Why, you ask? Because I can. However, this applies to JP as well.
-
I feel like the so called "velociraptors" in these movies are really deinonychus
-
One if the lab scientusts in the park said that they created the dinosaurs to look cool, not to be historically accurate. Did you not catch that part?
-
Edited by Kamots: 7/17/2015 4:24:19 AMIt's been widely accepted that raptors would probably have had feathers, but I suppose confirmation is nice. I wonder if such wings would be beneficial for running very quickly in certain environments. Possibly for stabilization purposes or for gliding/some other movement using the air.
-
It's amazing that these things went extinct just a few thousand years ago isn't it? [spoiler]sarcasm, don't hurt me please[/spoiler]
-
I wonder, if roles were reversed what they would imagine we looked like...
-
Edited by Vicex: 7/16/2015 8:37:17 PMThe sorta tried to explain this away in the movie... goes a long with the whole splicing theme they conjured up. Anyway, like the article suggests, wings were probably a residual feature that simply found other usages that conferred its selection....
-
[quote]We changed them to look appealing to the public[/quote]
-
Stop making me like you more!
-
The velociraptors in Jurassic Park/World were based of the Deinonychus/Utah Raptors. [spoiler]I myself am based off a Deinonychus, like the raptors from Jurassic World.[/spoiler]
-
Jp 3 had some
-
Inb4angrychristians
-
All the Jurassic Park dinos should have because honestly it looks terrifying.
-
But they can't have feathers because that would be macro evolution and macro evolution isn't real because evolution is cyclical.