{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by albert_flagrants:
7/7/2015 8:22:31 PM
2
Have you seen how many pve requirements are?
What about pvp players? You aren't thinking about them.
English
-
How hard is it for a pvp player to go into a pve raid and complete it. Not hard at all. But yet you want on people who are good at pvp to get the emblem. But moat pve players suck at pvp or dont like it so how is it fair for then? When its easier for you a pvp player to go do a raid and get it done
-
Your argument is invalid for lack of grammar, contradicting yourself, and making no sense. You're obviously salty because you'll never be good enough to go flawless ;). Scrub.
-
Edited by Briar, Acolyte of Nezarec: 7/7/2015 9:02:36 PMI enjoy the game and making it where over half of the people who play this game cant get that emblem is stupid and shows how much of a special snowflake you are. Your salty. Your a scrub. Its honestly easier this way and makes it more fair then if you want this emblem go do trials.
-
100 Crucible matches seems fair enough. And PvE makes up about 60 or 70 percent of the game, it makes sense that it's PvE focused. This way, everyone has a fair shot of getting it.
-
its about copleting every activity in the game, no id does not seem fair. The 100 crucible matches are like the story missions- easy af and everybody can easily do them. They should add something related to Trials since it is in fact an endgame activity and you have 2 months to find someone to carry you if you suck that hard.
