Story shouldn't count as content? What..?
That's a very dumb comment (no offense... Well some) it take a lot of time to make and give reason to the strokes and raid.
Especially for a game where the story was supposed to be epic and they have been trying to fix that.
English
-
It's fluff added to make the consumer think they're getting a deal. They should've been in the game at launch
-
This isn't cod. Dlc isn't just 4 multiplayer maps for $20.
-
TDB: 1 raid , a strike, few story missions , and a couple PvP maps HoW: horde mode with different levels, a strike, few story missions, and a couple PvP maps. Yep. Content is about equal
-
So you're saying you want more like that and not this new one having new areas for patrol, new story, new raid, new pvp game modes, new maps, new subclasses with individual ways to get them? You just want new maps for pvp, a raid, and 5 story missions? Go back to COD.
-
I didn't say that. You assumed what you wanted
-
[quote]Wrong wording. They shouldn't be counted as part of the value in the dlc. I don't and won't allow a support mission that I don't want to play.[/quote] [quote]Story missions shouldn't count as content. Are you actually going to play the story missions many times?[/quote] True you didn't say that in exact words but that's what you want apparently... Which I agree this game should of come out how it was originally promoted (look at the first videos of it on bungies YouTube channel and see how much just in those videos has been cut thanks to Activision wanting to turn this isn't it's new cash cow with COD on the constant decline)
-
You missed my point as well. I don't want multiplayer maps. I'm fine with what has been released and the price point it's been in the past. This dlc is fluffed with extras to double the price. If it were at previous price points id be OK with it. My issue is with the price and the perceived value for that price.
-
That makes a lot more sense than your original replies ;)