{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/19/2015 3:51:44 AM
2
Based on carbon dating. But historical record show it may have been at a castle(or something like that), which would mess up those results. Unless there were other tests they did that I'm not aware of.
But even so the process that created it is a mystery.
English
-
That's not how carbon dating works...
-
I know how carbon dating works. But if it is actually older than the fire, they can't find out because the fire tainted the sample.
-
No, because they can't explain how the image got there. That's why it's such mystery.
-
Then it's an irrelevant piece of cloth.
-
Because there was a fire at the castle
-
Are you tell me that was the cause?
-
The fire was the supposed cause of the carbon dating not being accurate.
-
That's what I said.
