So lets stop here, your first attempt is to use ad hominem. While i have already used this, im quite sure this is the basis of your argument, and therefore a waste of even taking serious. [quote]You just gave us the info regarding his science related experience in this same statement.[/quote] Wait, are you saying if i found a company, or group, in whatever field i want, i can automatically becoem a scientist, shit, i need to start the astrophysics foundation of the presidency of the world, then i can be the president of space exploration. Stahp it man. [quote](1) When I asked you to attempt to debunk my thinking, I didn't ask you to question the man's credentials. [/quote] You never asked me to genius, i stated that i wouldnt really even bother, since your thinking was plagiarized from an idiot. He doesnt have any scientific credentials other than creating a fake science group rooted in religious dogma. Just stahp man. [quote]I don't doubt the "atheistic" community concurs.[/quote] You seriously think the majority of the atheistic community believes there is no link between HIV and AIDs? Just stahp man. [quote]And you believe what they think? [/quote] Yeah i actually do, especially when discussing or learning about matters that pertain directly to science, say evolution, compared to a guy who was a lawyer, and has no fuc­king scientific background. Im mean, fu­ck, how stupid do you have to be to get this. One is an authority who understands how the scientific method works, the other is a religious zealot, who was a lawyer. Just stahp man. [quote]Uh...because you're bad at it. You tackled multiple areas about the individual without even once addressing the OP. Hypocritical much? Answer:[/quote] My original post, was that i wouldnt waste the time debating something, that is based in pure opinion, with no evidence, or understanding of science int he least to back it. Just stahp man. [quote](2) So what? I don't want to go on an in-person debate if you requested me.[/quote] Lastly, are you retarded? I was talking about the original author, he wont accept a single invitation to debate his claims from the opposition. Just stahp man. -blam!- grammar, when you have to pick on that to try and win an argument, it just means your argument cant stand alone, its called ad hominem.