{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/17/2015 1:06:58 AM
1
Logically it goes like this:
T rating -13 years old
Said upset player was 11.
If he wouldn't have been playing the game , as he shouldn't have, he would have never been in the position to get upset about other players slinging insults.
And that's a simple fact.
English
-
So basically you're saying if he were 13 this wouldn't have happened. It's rated teen because of the graphics and violence and whatnot not because of how people act online. And even if he was 13 and this still happened to him it doesn't justify what those guys did.
-
Edited by XUNHALLOWEDX: 6/17/2015 1:17:17 AMI did not say that all. I said if his brother wasn't playing this wouldn't have happened today, as you mentioned it is still possible this could of happened even if he was the recommended play age, and I agree. But I'm saying in that instance it would be a valid complaint. Although as it stands in this case this particular player was under the recommended age.
-
Well yes but still it's not his fault nobody deserves to be treated like that regardless of whether or not they're supposed be doing something.
