I do not mind paying full price for a full product(DLC). I think I should pay less for a product(DLC) if I get less of a product.
In a year or few months later when the product is available to use I will gladly pay the difference.
That sounds fair to me. Does it sound fair to anyone else?
-
You do realize that Playstation gets exclusive content because SONY paid for it, right? We're not just arbitrarily getting less. Microsoft didn't feel the need to compete, so Sony gets the goodies, and the console sales.