{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/7/2015 7:12:34 PM
8
-
Edited by SpiderMan Two: 6/9/2015 5:53:01 AMThe first book is sort of similar to the movie, with some moderate differences. The second book, "The Lost World" is completely different from the second movie, and I think Spielberg should have followed it more closely. It is a good book (they both are), while the second Jurassic Park movie is complete dog crap. It could have been so good if it had followed the book.
-
[quote]It could have been so good if it had followed the book.[/quote] I know that feel
-
Edited by DELIVER ME MEMES: 6/9/2015 1:43:24 AMJurassic park and the lost world. the movies follow the general premise but there are massive differences in the books. he only wrote 2 books, and he's dead now. 3 and 4 were not based on books and as a result are comperatively terrible.
-
-
Yep they were both good but it's sad that thy don't have all the dinos
-
I'll have to read them sometime
-
Yes you have to
-
Edited by Queen Magikarp: 6/7/2015 7:17:13 PMYes there's 2 that I know about[spoiler]there name like the first 2 movies the third one had no book[/spoiler]
