{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MiltonTheMango:
6/4/2015 8:29:28 AM
651
Why shouldn't thorn be nerfed in pvp (Resonable discussion)
Thorn is much better than every single weapon in pvp and if you believe in a balanced pvp you should want a nerf. If u don't tell me why. Please have well though out answers and no shit like 'git gud'. Be sensible
Edit: please try be constructive. I want this to be a discussion not people crying and moaning everywhere
Edit: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L7FV9l4hXo2tHD3XlFUp854XvJIwTKFIPvASLduPPS4/htmlview?pli=1
Have a look at this
-
It should be nerfed. Rate of fire should be same as Hawkmoon. Lower aim assist. Poison should be on every other shot. So 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. Two poison headshots still a kill. A poison + kinetic headshot should leave you alive at full shields. It would almost be a game within itself. Trying to make the most of every magazine, knowing when it's good to waste your "even" rounds and when it's best to use them. The biggest problems I have with the weapon is its HUGE amount of aim assist. Also the fact that you can get two very quick headshots with this weapon and retreat to cover to collect a kill. The two headshots can happen faster than alot of weapons time to kill.
