{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MiltonTheMango:
6/4/2015 8:29:28 AM
651
Why shouldn't thorn be nerfed in pvp (Resonable discussion)
Thorn is much better than every single weapon in pvp and if you believe in a balanced pvp you should want a nerf. If u don't tell me why. Please have well though out answers and no shit like 'git gud'. Be sensible
Edit: please try be constructive. I want this to be a discussion not people crying and moaning everywhere
Edit: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L7FV9l4hXo2tHD3XlFUp854XvJIwTKFIPvASLduPPS4/htmlview?pli=1
Have a look at this
-
Thorns a good gun but it's no different to guns like suros red death last word vex and all the other good guns if you hit all the bullets your shooting they Die no different to how they would with suros on trials and iron banner from a 34 with max thorn it take 3 shots to the body or 2 to the head but people have been using the final round perk to their advance leaving 2 or even 1 bullet in the mag and getting a headshot with it and Everyone is saying it should be. Nerfed but red death if you hit all 3 of the bullets to the head it's a kill and it regens health so thorn can be countered at range with a gun like suros and from close with last word or vex so in my opinion it's fine the way it is
