{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/30/2015 3:21:53 AM
2
Bruh don't try and act like the Empires you listed up there don't have atrocities of their own as bad, if not worse, than Europe's
English
-
But there was some infighting when the king didn't name his aire that is but that wasn't super common
-
When there was in fighting the empire it stayed in the palace when there was infighting in Europe thousands would die.
-
That ain't true though
-
Typically it was true when there was strife in the Ottoman Empire and the sultan died the fighting stayed in the palace
-
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Interregnum http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Civil_War_(1509%E2%80%931513) Plenty of big civil wars to go round
-
The moguls never fought each other
-
They were too busy fighting all their neighbours
-
I said moguls!
-
I assume you mean the Mughals? They did a lot of conquest
-
And then they did some ruling they lasted 100 years ish
-
The South Indians weren't big fans
-
They brough unity and made foriegn invasion impossible and if the stupid Indians didn't require everyone in a fortress city to die to preserve their "honor" they would of liked them better but they were by far better than the British.
-
They were the foreign invaders m8, and the actual Indians in the South were not happy about it at all
-
They were ununified and the biuld large buildings and the didn't take the riches of Indian and left the British did
-
Mughals were pushed out before the Brits came anyways
-
The more feel apart and back into city states as before.
-
-
Agreed
