{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/25/2015 1:41:55 PM
1
Wrong video. I'm looking for it now, but on the road. If you would take a look at the correct video you would see. It goes into detail.
English
-
There are plenty of videos of the Rhino and they all show the same functionality. Some of them are double-action only, in which case the hammer DOES cycle with each trigger pull, but the hammer only rotates the barrel and cocks the gun. It doesn't FIRE the weapon as the hammers on them do in Destiny. I'm well versed in how the Rhino functions. It doesn't function as the hand cannons in Destiny.
-
The rhino? That's not the name. DARPA made it, so you know it's named something retarded. Look, iv got shit going on. I'll look for it for you, but look into some of the stuff you say before saying it. I get back from my trip in about 8 hours, so you will for sure have your link then. Till then good luck.
-
I'll be waiting.
-
Cool. Also, you don't load or shoot bullets. It's glimmer. Which is programmable matter. Considering that, I'm quite sure it doesn't matter how the gun works, unless you know how glimmer works? Probably shoulda read your grimoire too tbh.
-
I have read the grimoire. What you're shooting is irrelevant when the object you're using to shoot it is mechanically based on modern firearms.
-
....okay so if I make a gun that shoots watermelons but looks exactly like the rhino, it doesn't matter? Look man you are knowledgable but missing a few things. What if I made a replica of the scout rifle and made it shoot out lava? Doesn't matter cause it's based off a modern gun...? No.
-
What are you even saying? If you make a gun that shoots watermelons and looks exactly like the rhino, I hope the barrel is properly aligned with the Cylinder and you don't expect the visible hammer to function as normal hammer or else it's not going to work very well. You can put whatever you want into your example, but it doesn't change the physical properties of the mechanical object in question. For instance, I could not take the Rhino, modify it so that the barrel is aligned with the top, and still expect it to work. It would violently destroy itself in my hands.
-
... You completely missed my point. It's programmable matter. It can move like a program. Do you get what I'm saying...? Do I need to just say it? You realize programs can uhh... Move? For versatile than a solid? Or a liquid? Or a gas? My point was to show that your analogy is incorrect. You said you read the grimoire
