No the dullard here is you, as it was in our last back and forth (and everyone else could see that). It was a total waste of time trying to have a logical discussion with you, as you were so riddled and distracted with bias that you couldn't even keep up. And here you are again, frothing at the mouth with bias to champion another cause. I understood the question just fine, you clod. Do not mistake my ability to predict you and say "nope, not worth the effort" as a 'lack of understanding.' I just see no reason to, again, waste my time. I'm not going to answer stupidly emotional questions, asked out of pure gun rights advocacy bias, especially when my comment was not even an argument against gun ownership; my comment was nothing more than stating the fact that I have no need (personally) for owning a gun. Whether that "need" is entirely literal/out of necessity, or simply loosely saying I have no interest in owning or firing a gun for any purpose, I'm not going to "get there" with you through the tedium of justifying my use of the internet, because that is ridiculous. And at no point was I saying that YOU or anyone else does not need or should not have the right to own a gun.