[quote]This sort of reply acts as a smokescreen.[/quote]Why?[quote]You respond in so many different ways, even down to correcting spelling or syntax that you can make it look like you have provided a proper counter argument.[/quote]Aren't we supposed to include all known factual information to support our own conclusion?[quote]You have not.[/quote]I have not since I.../I have not because I... Saying "I have not" without an explanation is a little bias on your end.[quote]At one point you went into suffixes in detail and didn't even address the point of the passage you corrected![/quote]I was explaining how by definition what was stated makes sense. Are we not supposed to be dependent heavily and evidence, correct terminology, and semantics?[quote]In the usual apologist manner, all you are doing is posting a wall of text, presumably so it is hard to scrutinise some of your more nonsensical assertions, or at least time consuming enough that people decide they can't be bothered.[/quote]Are you saying that it would be better for me to write only one sentence at a time?[quote]If we're going to endlessly quote one another, I need a pc instead of a phone or this becomes far too time consuming...[/quote]I'm doing this off my phone. It's the only way for me to be notified, "You got a forum reply."[quote]...so I'll address your 'argument' when I get home.[/quote]Okay. Whatever helps you.[quote]However, from this point on, maybe it would help to stay on subject and try to be concise.[/quote]What do you mean to be "concise?" I was trying to be as specific as possible.