{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/6/2015 2:47:34 AM
1
If you know what he meant then why play that game? Evolution takes time to achieve speciation.
English
-
Edited by Cobalt: 5/6/2015 3:00:24 AMBecause it won't happen. And he won't dig anything up from the past either. Depends on your worldview though. Whatever example presented is going to be more believable for someone who leans towards evolution cause they're hungry for more evidence. Whereas it's going to take an AWFUL lot to convince me cause...I believe totally differently. I guess I just don't really give evolution a lot of credit cause it doesn't make any sense to me how it can explain the incredible complexity in which our world works. It doesn't line up to me.
-
Edited by Britton: 5/6/2015 3:00:46 AMThen your position is that the fossil record is all lies?
-
Edited by Cobalt: 5/6/2015 3:03:16 AMI honestly don't know a ton about the fossil record. I've observed some of them, but honestly haven't put much time into it. I didn't really put much credit in then either though. And no not necessarily all lies, but probably misinterpreted yes.
-
You'd be amazed how much we've learned from it. Go look into it.
-
Perhaps I will. Just know I'll be observing it from a different perspective.
-
That's fine. But use actual scientific sources. Those creationist websites rely on you not knowing what you're talking about, so you'll just be learning the wrong stuff.
-
Edited by Cobalt: 5/6/2015 3:29:25 AMI'm saying my [i]own [/i]worldview, not going to some website that shields out the ideas of other people. Any way you look at it though, there is going to be bias.
-
People over use the word bias. There's no bias when you're supported by physical evidence and facts.
