Your stance on evolution is invalidated when you bring 6000 year old texts of backwards societies to support a position in modern science.
English
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/4/2015 3:40:44 PMAnd why is that bad? Besides, that's why the author in the OP is from the present.
-
Holy shit, you're retarded.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/5/2015 2:09:49 AMI don't think so. You haven't provided a counter argument against the point that has already been established.
-
What he is saying, and excuse me if I am mistaken, is that the Bible alone is not enough to prove a point. It is a 6000 year old text and a lot of it's teachings don't apply to modern day. Even though I respect your belief, you are not supplying evidence to support your claim. You raise some good points, but tell me, do you really think that millions of animals from a single species will be able to fossilise? The theory of evolution is just that, a theory. It is trying to say "prove me wrong." It was created from a man long dead observing animal's behaviours and biology and trying to justify them. He was not saying "this is set in stone and cannot be wrong" (which is effectively what you're doing) and was instead saying "this is what I think and you're more than welcome to say otherwise." What you're doing is acting on a publicly accepted [b]theory[/b] (and I can't stress that enough) and saying it's wrong. And whilst that is fine, you giving no evidence to the contrary and belittling anyone who disagrees with you is the thing I have issues with.