{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by NoiselessPurse15:
5/2/2015 7:37:24 PM
1
1) Creationism does violate the laws of physics, seeing as how God made all the matter and energy in the universe. Don't act like creationism is in any way scientific.
2) Adaptation and evolution are seen today. Adaptation is a form of evolution. If evolution isn't real, why do we have to make new vaccines every year?
3) There are millions of fossils in the earth, but there are several reasons why the fossil record is somewhat incomplete.
- The conditions required for an organism to become a fossil are very rare
- We haven't found all of the fossils on the planet yet
Your argument again relies on ignorance.
4) Those blood cells and tissues were mostly found in frozen dinosaurs. They were just very well preserved.
5) Hundreds of different, independent studies have been done on the age of the earth using radiometric dating.
6) The great flood could never have happened. Where did all that water come from? How did we get this much genetic diversity from so few organisms in just 6000 years?
All your aguments rely on ignorance of science. These aren't even your arguments, which leads me to believe that you're very uneducated, which means that you don't have a post-secondary education, or you're still in high school. Don't bother replying, you'll just embarrass yourself.
English
-
Edited by RichardSalad: 5/3/2015 1:24:44 AMI've seen you post before noiseless, you rely all of your arguments on saying that the other person is uneducated and doesn't know anything about the basics of science. I honestly think you are either a troll or just a person who doesn't know how to have a meaningful debate without tossing around derogatory terms. And as of my education, I spend eight years in college majoring in natural sciences and philosophy, I'm fairly sure that is more than you have because if you had it you wouldn't be so bad at learning new things or at least not being a dick when you think someone is wrong. And if either of the two of us is an uneducated high school student it is you because, out of all the times I have seen you telling people to provide evidence, I haven't seen you produce a single shred. And now that someone has you get all butt hurt because it doesn't support you view of things. "Don't bother replying, you will only embarrass yourself."
-
Lol, good job avoiding all of my points and going straight for personal attacks. A philosophy major? Lol, how pathetic. That's barely a real major. I'm a doctor kid, trust me, there's no way you're more educated than me. Because you didn't address any of my points, I win, and you lose again.
