Your argument contradicts itself. God is even less observable than evolution. So why use the argument that evolution is not observable in a lab to disprove it's existence? Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory. If it didn't seem to fit in with what we have observed over years of study and research, then it wouldn't be so accepted in the scientific community. It wouldn't be taught in schools as "fact". But then we're both biased, aren't we? I doubt we'll ever change eachother's views.
English
-
[quote]Your argument contradicts itself. God is even less observable than evolution.[/quote] Of course, I don't bother denying it, but the fact that you included that it is less observable than Evolution is to say that you recognize that Evolution itself has a level of insight that is unobservable. It possesses no theory as to why these complex genetics would need to develop from simpler origins, but hey, the belief erases the need of subjection and morality. All is well.
-
[quote][quote]Your argument contradicts itself. God is even less observable than evolution.[/quote] Of course, I don't bother denying it, but [u]the fact that you included that it is less observable than Evolution is to say that you recognize that Evolution itself has a level of insight that is unobservable.[/u] It possesses no theory as to why these complex genetics would need to develop from simpler origins, but hey, the belief erases the need of subjection and morality. All is well.[/quote] Just because he quotes you doesn't mean he is agreeing with you lol. Thats like saying because i used the word God in a sentence i believe in him
-
[quote]Your argument contradicts itself.[/quote] It isn't my opinion.
-
Edited by Britton: 4/30/2015 3:53:07 PMBut your are presenting it as such. So, what you are representing your views and opinions with contradicts itself.
-
It's from http://christian-apologetics.org/2011/evolution-fact-or-fantasy/.
-
And its wrong.
-
...and I suppose you have more, or at least as much as, involvement in the well-being of the world as you do in these forums. Why would you have an issue with an individual willingly subject Himself to a Power that you see to be inexistent?
-
Because you're trying to spread it, and get others to believe it.
-
Would you not want others to know what you know? Besides, this is the internet, the informational hub of the world, which was originally designed for only the military during the Cold War. ...and I'm not forcing it on anyone, I'm only trying to allow those who read it to think and discern for themselves, and this is not even my opinion. This is from the words of a man who have concluded his research on the topic. What source have you provided that have never been from our words, but just the thoughts of one who has studied and has come to the same conclusions as you?
-
I do spread things I know and I do not spread things I don't know. Your OP is something that cannot be known. It is and always will be opinion, and you spreading it as fact only undermines the knowledge we have achieved so far, based on something that cannot ever be tested, or proven. You're doing a disservice to the young minds on the forum who may actually read what you're saying and believe it because they do not know any better. So sure, spread what you know, but this is something you cannot, for a fact, know. What you present is only something you believe and have faith in based on a book that has unproveable and untestable claims.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/1/2015 5:49:27 AMI know what I know to be true. Everyone else can take it as the deem fit, but the translation and the interpretation of scripture has and will always remain. If you don't condone to posts with this mentality, stop bumping it, or better yet, keep bumping, the more attention, the more the merrier.
-
I have no issue with people seeing proper rebuttals to your claims. The problem is that what is true, isn't up to you. What is true is true, regardless of your opinion. And unfortunately your opinions on creation simply aren't true based on the world we live in.
-
Exactly.
-
That website definitely wouldn't be biased
-
[quote]Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory.[/quote] *Merriam scratches his head.*