Well for starters, the Earth isn't a closed system. At this very moment, the planet is being bombarded by radiation (a form of energy) from not only our sun, but from the millions of other stars that you see in the night sky. Second, [quote]Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum[/quote] I do hope you're joking with this one.

Ain't joking. How are planets spinning in different ways counter clockwise and just clockwise? Big bang has to be counter or just clock wise. And stars, we haven't observed a star being born. We just see them explode. If the big bang is true how cone there 300 recorded supernovas? There has to be millions Astrunauts thought the moon was going to be two feet deep because of dust. Well...it's not.

How did we go from evolution to the big bang? *sigh* Alright, I'll bite. [quote]Ain't joking. How are planets spinning in different ways counter clockwise and just clockwise? Big bang has to be counter or just clock wise. [b]Everything in our solar system orbits around the sun in the same direction. Most objects in their respective galaxies orbit in the same direction. The few anomalies that are found are likely due to past collisions or interactions with gravitational fields beyond the center of rotation.[/b] And stars, we haven't observed a star being born. We just see them explode. If the big bang is true how cone there 300 recorded supernovas? There has to be millions [b]Stars take millions, if not billions, of years to form. We can observe the nebulae that will give birth to the star and the point where the star will form (due to that point being the center of rotation for the nebulae or by observing a cluster of mass there), but the process is too slow to measure in human lifetimes. We don't see the total number of supernovae because we can't see the entire galaxy at once, let alone the entire universe. Our telescopes and instruments can only be pointed in one direction at a time, while only providing a very, very narrow view.[/b] Astrunauts thought the moon was going to be two feet deep because of dust. Well...it's not. [b]I don't understand what you were trying to say here.[/b] [/quote]

The reason we don't see most supernovas are because when you are looking into space you are also looking back in time. It takes time for a star to supernova.