{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by ChinNationFTW:
4/27/2015 7:48:50 AM
1
You just sound like a complete bullshit. The extra troops has nothing to ensure the win in a winning war. Russia promise to fight Japan and The Japanese knew that, They were going to surrender. The Nukes were already an overkill and a sure Victory. In the end, US let Japan keep their Emperor so it's complete pointless. And to Stop the Rusians? Hell no it cost a hatred then led to the Cold War.
English
-
Edited by BrayerIncognito: 4/27/2015 9:31:02 AMNope. If I were you I would get a bit more educated. 1st thing is to watch the documentary series The World at War, made in the 70's. It features interviews with the politicians, generals and their aids from all sides during WWII. They even have Hitlers secretary talking about when he killed himself. It cuts through all the bullshit and tells what really happened by the people in charge at the time. It will open your eyes my friend, to the bullshit you have been told.
-
Edited by ChinNationFTW: 4/27/2015 7:43:36 PMHere's the bullshit that you just went off topic. You still didn't prove how those if up to "100,000" soldiers might ensure the win when US already winning for SURE. Telling me to watch that documentary has little to nothing to answer our argument about the "100,000" extra soldiers. US already pretty much won the Pacific war since the fall of Germany and Japan knew their lost is inevitable. US don't even need a land invasion they just keep bombing all Japanese military bases when Japan's air force already been eliminated. With the pending soviet declaring war on Japan and the Nukes that "100,000" soldiers has nothing to do with it. You could have just say the Allies just want to save lives on their side and let the Russians do all the work for revenge. This argument drag out longer than it suppose to be.
