{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by refuzeUS:
4/19/2015 5:12:27 PM
9
How is this even a question? Sports where your size, agility, strength, durability matters and SC is likely the hardest trophy to obtain out of big 4. (mlb, nba, nfl, nhl). All that compared to sports where you foul opponent when you touch him. To win in hockey you must have a team built with the right pieces and players need all-around endurance, to win in basketball you need 1-2 superstars and extremely good actor skills to show how hurt you got when opponent touched you, while throwing the ball as high as possible, because that shows how bad it was.
English
-
GO PENS[quote][/quote]
-
Rangers baby!
-
How the -blam!- can you compare a high contact sport to a low contact sport. How -blam!-ing ignorant.
-
Those three other sports you mentioned with hockey are more unpredictable, obtain the capabilities to have constant lead changes throughout the game and and have a lot more to do with in the game momentum, makes those three a lot more exciting than hockey, and yes I said that about the MLB
-
Delusional.
-
Ignorant
-
You've obviously never watched basketball.
-
Is that why the heat got their asses whipped last year in the finals? Best player, yes....championship, no. You don't know shit.
-
This comment is stupid. I watch all sports and every championship caliber team needs the right pieces and chemistry. Look at the San Antonio Spurs, the complete opposite of the flopping LA Clippers. If you don't even watch or play basketball you're input is invalid.
