{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/10/2015 6:19:10 PM
1
No it's that its a great game and most people don't give credit for how good it actually is
English
-
It's not great. It's mediocre. It promised so much and then failed to provide a good story or varied gameplay to keep it interesting. It rewards grinding for hours rather than skill and offers the same experience that games like World of warcraft have offered for years prior. What's more, it wants you to buy access to content that was already available on the disk from launch. Yeah it is so great.
-
Well you should have bought it on disk then and it did provide all that it said it would ie. Hours and hours of gameplay that supports players that grind. And the game shouldn't be based off of skill because those who rank the lowest in crucible or I'm the strikes etc. will get jack shit so how is that fair either
-
Edited by Mr EGFC: 4/11/2015 12:33:28 PMI did buy it on disk. Pre-ordered it on disk even. Had the disk the day before launch. What does that have to do with anything? I said I had to buy access to content already on it, not I had to buy the disk to get said content. Even then what you said is false, because it completely failed to give what players expected. Why should it reward grinding? Low levels players don't matter! In the beta I saw level 5 guys destroying the level 8s in iron banner and even in full release players were being wreaked by low levelled people with the Khovstov. And why should it be fair to lower levels? It should give them some weapons or armor but encourage them to play the story and the crucible to get to the light levels faster to experience the endgame content which is heavily orientated around the expansions, which gets them money.
