{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/26/2015 12:08:16 AM
1
Sorry autocorrect. What I was trying to say was England is a democracy now so the queen doesn't have any power. Hope that clears everything up you I'll mannered -blam!-
English
-
Actually it doesn't. Why need a queen in a democracy? Why keep the tradition?
-
The queen is just a symbol now, she's not part of anything, she is just a symbol of England, but she still can't make laws or do whatever she wants
-
Queen can't make law, but she's the head of parliament. Laws have to be run through her before coming official. Whether she denies or vetoes anything is a different story. Power still exists within the English monarchy. If not, both princes would be looking for jobs right now. The time of "off with their heads" has long been gone. I'm not retarded.
-
Why bother celebrate the Fourth of July? It was long ago too. Because it's part of our history, standing at the basis of our country just as the royal family is part of their history. To disrespect one is to disrespect your own, as it was part of our history too. Or do you think the colonists succeeded from India?
-
Calling a nation a democracy while keeping a queen around only to decay while sitting on her throne collecting riches from archaic royalties is incredibly stupid. Traditions are meant to be broken. And as far as the 4th of July is concerned...only American monkeys swoon at the sight of explosives elevating in memory of the nations violent independence. Or do you think the native Americans handed over their land to us?
