4 involves much more micro management. Each city has its own happiness and health level which you have to keep an eye on. Only a minor annoyance once you get used to keeping an eye on your city list, and using the filters to check which cities need their growth halted. 5 scraps the health system entirely and makes happiness universal. The only real downside to this is cities become a little faceless i.e a conquered and annexed city will behave identically to your capital... also, a lot of people slated 5 for its one unit per tile rule, and on small maps I can understand it. On large maps though, it works beautifully well. The problem with 4's 'stacks of doom' (units are infinitely stackable on a single tile) is combat came down to who had the bigger stack, as opposed to who martialled their troops and used the terrain better. 4 has a little more variety in its vanilla version as it had more scenarios, and religion was a mechanic from the get-go. Vanilla 5 is a little more bare-bones, so you'll probably find 5 a little easier to get to grips with. Once you are comfortable, I highly recommend the expansion packs. Adding religion and espionage to the mix really makes things interesting! Hope I helped ☺

Yup, very helpful my man. Thanks a lot. And I have the expansions, at least for 4. I'll actually have to double check if I have 5 but based on your take, I think it would be a better starting point. [spoiler]Do you have Steam?[/spoiler]

Yep. Bieltan11. Protip for warfare: always bring siege engines early on. Later on, air dominance is key, and a strong navy is useful forever. This is true in both games, though in 5 you have to position your units with more care to ensure your siege engines are protected. Good luck!