{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/22/2015 5:56:36 PM
2
but like I said it's not comparable. in your opinion it is. in mine it's not. see now we're back on opinions. :] sexual assault scars people sexual assault can lead to suicide sexual assault can ruin someone. This in no way can. That's like saying you can compare dying to being asleep the only difference is you wake up. Driving is the same as a car accident but in one your car isn't damaged. Stepping in a puddle is the same as swimming because you get wet either way. Victim blaming isn't only in sexual assault. ferguson Mi victim blaming. Eric Garner in NYC victim blaming.
English
-
Edited by freshlydunbread: 2/22/2015 6:25:53 PMAre apples oranges? No! But they're certainly comparable on the grounds that they're both fruit, [b]SHOULD ONE CHOOSE TO COMPARE THEM[/b]
-
You can't compare them based on that lol there completely different. yes they're fruit but they're both different.
-
Edited by freshlydunbread: 2/22/2015 7:27:27 PMCompare: estimate, measure or note the [b]similarity[/b] or [b]dissimilarity[/b] between. Apples are not oranges, but they're comparable on the grounds that they're both fruit. Apples are not oranges, but they're comparable on the grounds that one is red and one is orange. You see, I can compare them based on whatever makes them similar or dissimilar, as that's what a [i]comparison[/i] is. Do you not know what comparison is either, Jared? Should I weave that definition into the definition of an analogy for you too???
-
but none of those matter
-
Edited by freshlydunbread: 2/22/2015 6:49:51 PMAww come back Jared, we just want to make you Internet famous! Don't stop saying stupid things just yet!!
-
Edited by freshlydunbread: 2/22/2015 6:41:23 PMI can take the 5 minutes it takes to show you why it does matter, if you'd like. I really don't mind; backing you into walls and watching you use irrelevancies as your defense as you slink away from what's actually happening here is not only entertaining for me, but also for, now 15 different people on this thread, 3 of my close friends, and soon much of /r/facepalm
-
Edited by freshlydunbread: 2/22/2015 6:27:46 PMSee this buddy?? This is what, in the science community, we call the [b]scientific method[/b] of using [b]empirical evidence[/b] to support claims! I'll empirically show you why this is empirical evidence that supports my claims if you really want lol, it's a 5 minute process. [quote]It's a fact that in cases of sexual assault of a minor (also known as statutory -blam!-), an adult takes advantage of an unsuspecting and naive child. It's a fact that in this case, an Adult took advantage of an unsuspecting and naive child. It's a fact that in cases of sexual assault of a person of age, victim blaming is a common tactic used to defend the alleged perpetrator. It's a fact that in this case, victim blaming is a common tactic used to defend the alleged perpetrator.[/quote] It is fact that they [b]can be compared[/b] (see: comparable) on these grounds. You can try to use semantics to make it opinion all you want, but in the end, it's my CHOICE to compare them on these grounds and your CHOICE to sift through their differences. It's by no means an opinion that they [b]ARE ABLE TO BE COMPARED[/b], CLEARLY, as they [b]HAVE JUST BEEN SUCCESSFULLY COMPARED[/b].
