If you actually read my original post I wanted to clear the air. After reading many awful comments towards me for having my opinion, I began to think what's the point in arguing if they will just badger me for having an opinion and trying to help make the understanding of the situation better. You get me?
English
-
No I do not get you. But I am not sure how your original post was attempting to clear the air. If you were merely stating your opinion on the matter then so be it. So was everyone else. If you were opening it up as a public forum, which I have to assume was the case since you posted on a forum, then you had to expect people to debate with you.
-
I knew people wouldn't agree. The a given. I just wanted to make a point and help people understand that it's not all wrong doing in this act.
-
Edited by Candyman5268: 2/20/2015 6:23:55 AMI do appreciate the significantly less condensing responses since your first two replies. (Sincerely). And this is an attempt not to be condensing as well but a genuine and educational argument to that. Taken straight from Merriam-Webster for the definition of entrapment: "the action of luring an individual into committing a crime in order to prosecute the person for it."
-
I'm not saying he didn't do this. I'm saying this kid needs to see there is a lesson to be learned here. This guy can benefit him even though he is an asshole.
-
Edited by Gabe: 2/20/2015 6:06:27 AMHmmm ... Sure alright that's fair. I think that the way you presented your opinion though could've been better. You can't deny that when you say "TBH I would've done the -blam!-ing same" or "kid is too -blam!-ing young" and just foul language, it'll get a negative response. I dunno, I took a technical writing course and in the section about writing formal complaints in the work place I learned that the best way to write one is to express your sentiments without coming off as emotional about it.