originally posted in:The Garage
In a good way.
[url=http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-challenger-srt-hellcat-test-review]Hellcat (Challenger)[/url]
[url=http://media.caranddriver.com/images/media/623482/2015-dodge-charger-srt-hellcat-photo-624706-s-520x318.jpg]Hellcat (Charger)[/url]
[url=http://blog.caranddriver.com/super-charger-dodges-707-hp-hellcat-v-8-is-headed-for-the-charger-sedan/]Write up[/url]
[url=http://blog.americanmuscle.com/rumor-2015-shelby-gt500-to-have-more-hp-than-the-challenger-hellcat/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=fbpost7142014rendering2015]HellStang?[/url]
-
Doesn't look like a muscle car to me anymore.
-
They look good but they just don't do anything for me. They are cool though and I'm glad they exist.
-
Oh. I see what you did there. Well, now I have nothing to say except I totally agree.
-
Hellcat was essentially a big time marketing tool by Chrysler to get boomers to buy an SRT product again. The Viper has sold poorly since the new generation came out, so a hellcat Viper will likely stir some interest again
-
I still prefer old muscle body style to modern boxes.