{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/29/2014 9:07:46 PM
1
Yeah but after that month you didn't have to wait a year to play the rest of the dlc.
English
-
wow......... again no need to change my argument here...... timed elusive content.... you guys get the whole content early..... we get 1 little thing here and there early...... seriously its sad how people think they can defend there entiled attitudes, ...
-
Ugh hate to tell you but you're defending your entitled attitude right now.
-
Edited by TommyG: 10/29/2014 9:55:53 PMIt's the length of time that's the problem. Waiting a year to gain access to things you already paid for, especially things that are probably going to be outdated, it's crazy. You can't just say it's the same thing because 'timed exclusives are timed exclusives'. Not in this situation at least.
-
For 1 strike...... that has no effect on yiur progression. ....
-
Edited by TommyG: 10/29/2014 10:08:26 PMOh well if it's only one strike! Fact is, xbox users get less content for the same money. Even if it's just one strike. A strike that, when they finally get access to it, will probably be outdated. If cod did the same model. Xbox got 5 maps, Ps got 4. Paid the same amount. Ps would get the fifth map a year later. Unfortunately there will be a new cod out and the map is practically outdated...is that fair? I understand that it's not that big of a deal as such, you know because it's only 'one strike' but it's still a bit of a shit way to do business.
-
I'm sorry I misinterpreted your post, been reading too many idiot posts these days XD
