This thread is inspired by another: view original post
In regards to creatures and animals in general. Tigers can't be proved or disproved by our human minds. When will people realise this, and begin to understand that, "TIGERS ARE DEFINITELY REAL BECAUSE I WAS MAULED BY ONE" and "BUT THE TIGER IS JUST A PRODUCT OF YOUR SENSES AND BEYOND OUR SENSORY INPUT WE CAN KNOW NOTHING DEFINITE ABOUT THE UNIVERSE", are both wrong?
-
But if tigers don't exist, how do you explain potatoes? Check mate atigerists.
-
-
Edited by History HD: 2/5/2013 2:37:02 PMHistory CHANNEL > national geographic (fake mainstream shows)
-
Our senses are axiomatic. Even though we understand that they are not perfect, our fundamental understanding of reality is based on them. So it's pretty foolish to assert that "proof beyond our senses" is required to demonstrate something's existence.
-
You should rename yourself to Parody Thread.
-
Started a new topic: The amount of disrespect on here is astounding - SHITPOSTERS
-
If a tiger fell over in the woods but no one was around to see it, did it happen?
-
Cute big kitties, I love them.
-
Tigers are actually lions in disguise.
-
Is the Tiger a Dad?
-
Tigers are adorable, delicious little creatures.
-
Psuedo religious thread is psuedo.
-
Yes, robots are wrong.
-
I lol'd