Now, granted this user hasn't done too much (relatively) research into the field aside from about a dozen YT channel videos on the matter over the past year or two from various classical liberal/alternative-right/lite/independent journo/libertarian/AnCap (not fake) newz sources and would like to get a dialogue going here about this this thing with a clever name that "sounds" nice (yes the internet should be "neutral" in the sense no country owns it or can make bogus "hate speech" laws regarding it, but NN is actually interference from the government, thus not making it neutral at all...what a misnomer, though most liberal policy titles are misnomers), is largely backed by "progressive" regressives and is basically government regulation on the free market (which tends to screw buyers and sellers over and create monopolies and drive up prices regardless of supply-and-demand...Kynsian economics garbage...Austryahn economics is better). The commi-puke belief system is basically great king mogglmohg the twelf seeing chocos having a problem with dragonz in the sky circling them and swooping down sometimes and tricking good chocos to clip deir wyngs in exchange for beind placed on an elevated hill to escape annual floods, which also replenish the valley with gyshahlgreehns, but the dragohnz are still there and they have their treasure in their caves but the good chocos cannot risk getting flushed away to eat those gyshahlgreehns in the valley to grow strong and big and fly up to those dragohnz and beat them, essentially creating a "glass-ceiling". Notice how these leftist agitprop groups all work for nazee-sympathizers and claim the people they attack are the nazees? The big globalist corporatist oligarchy partnered WITH the deep state and governments in general and people will never be able to grow unless they accept individualism, self-determination, and personal liberty (don't have to bake the cake) as that destroys the perpetual dependency on the gummit. Also..pretty much everything B H S D O'dronebomber who marrid a mahn did this user takes an opposite stance on.
Googaleeemoogalee, who went from not doing bahd, as their old creedo went, to doing "gewd" which is scarry. F-book also supports NN which is striking. This user thinks if these two "tentacles" of the n W o support NN, then this user is against it, despite other garbage companies like ComeagainnotverylikelyCast are against it, if the little company can have the freedom to create a package that they can grow from niche to mainstream then this user supports that, as the world needs moar internetz, moar gateways, moar choices, moar isps, moar options, as to ensure a world-class EMP device does not sufficiently destroy the internet which exposes the elite and their dastrdly deeds on a daily basis. These demohncrahts likely just wanna keep deir loleetuhexpress private child island pics and browser history secret from uhs "proles" huh.
Please be civil and respond accordingly pro or con what this user has posited as this user would like to know more on the subject and read opinions on the matter here....as this user may be inclined to swing the other way...convince this user this is one of the only few good things these two companies and illegitimate prez ever supported...either way the threats the F C C head has gotten over this (as detailed by Infowahrs) is not warranted. Doing such things helps invalid ones points, as who is going to think such displays of force is for good?
Also, yes this user has a habit of typing in walls of text and YES some words are purposely misspelled for several reasons this user prefers not to talk about, muh own issues are muh own it's not that unreadable.
Thanks for reading. There's a wahr on for yr mind! -Infowahrs dot com forward slash show.
Peace. Luv. And Anrchy!
-
Edited by steg567: 12/12/2017 12:40:22 AM[quote]Now, granted this user hasn't done too much research into the field aside from about a dozen YT channel videos[/quote] And that right there explains why you don't support net neutrality.