{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MentttalChikken:
6/23/2016 12:17:21 PM
428
Why people think striker is op all of a sudden
I main hunter and people all over the forums are complaining how op strikers are. I find this ironic because strikers are relatively the same since launch. Guardians (especially my fellow hunters) are bitching about how op shoulder charge and FoH, only because they have saltyness left over from the last nerf. So on behalf of all hunters; I apologize if we bitch more often than usual. And we can't help it that something in our brain called the frontal bitch lobe is working over time.
Again I apologize,
A SLIGHTLY bitchy hunter
-
5 RepliesEdited by mayo68: 6/23/2016 11:02:54 PMI wouldn't worry much. Bungie has said it in print today..."when one class becomes the default choice for anyone who wants to do well in the crucible, WE see that as a problem". So by that illogical logic, Titans will be nerfed next. It's like a guy that builds a race car, only making changes that HE (being WE from the previous statement) feels are needed. See where I am going with this? The guy DRIVING the car is the one qualified to suggest the changes...HE is the guy doing the driving. This is a logical approach to making changes in the system, and if your statistics confirm what the driver is telling you...a change is needed. Until these guys get off their high horses, this will be the pattern, WE the player, will be made to observe. I say this in defense of my Bladedancer, because the changes were based in the opposite order. The numbers say do it, so WE at bungie will change it, completely ignoring the fact that the drivers have not noticed anything is wrong. Not to mention that by bunnies logic, everything will eventually get nerfed at some point and then buffed at a later date to make it more "balanced" again...STUPID!
