{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MentttalChikken:
6/23/2016 12:17:21 PM
428
Why people think striker is op all of a sudden
I main hunter and people all over the forums are complaining how op strikers are. I find this ironic because strikers are relatively the same since launch. Guardians (especially my fellow hunters) are bitching about how op shoulder charge and FoH, only because they have saltyness left over from the last nerf. So on behalf of all hunters; I apologize if we bitch more often than usual. And we can't help it that something in our brain called the frontal bitch lobe is working over time.
Again I apologize,
A SLIGHTLY bitchy hunter
-
1 ReplyEdited by Akron: 6/23/2016 7:15:57 PMJust like everything else in this game, you have one thing considered op and one thing considered ok. Bungie nerfs (often too much) the op thing, and now you are left with the acceptable thing being the best option, because it isn't suffering from being nerfed. Eventually, whiny people start to cry about that, and it also ends up getting nerfed. Vicious cycle. Bungie should be embarrassed we are approaching year -blam!-ing 3 and over half of the weapon archetypes are useless in crucible, the lag (that they blame players for) is still persistent as ever, and the experience is extremely stale due to them being unable to balance the game without throwing nerfs at everything. You would think the game was indie at this point, but at least indie devs seem to care about the quality of their product. Everything about this game has always felt lazy and half assed (except for vog/kf.).
